[RFCI-Discuss] RFC-ignorant.org list accuracy and refresh frequency...

[mouss]

Jean-Marc Pigeon a écrit :
> Bonjour Ralph,
> 
> On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 20:35 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> * Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp at safe.ca>:
>>
>>> 	Problem:
>>> 	RFC-Ignorant is publishing FALSE information about
>>> 	the simple fact "do you accept mail to postmaster
>>> 	and abuse", this is done via a very simple test
>>> 	and my remark that test is not done in a timely
>>> 	fashion to make sure that information is still
>>> 	true, making the data-base inaccurate over
>>> 	time.
>> So why does the site that's listed not delist themselves?
> 	Uh?
> 	Not sure I fully understand your comment.
> 
> 	1) I have "delist" myself (but nothing is happening)
> 	2) listed since 2005, just notice this, log 
> 	   indicate since 2007 no test was conducted by
> 	   RFC-ignorant.org (until proved otherwise),
> 	   This is far to be a good indication about
> 	   data-base accuracy... do we agree?
> 
> 	
> 	



Feb 22 21:06:47 imlil postfix/smtp[14251]: 39E6FE548A7:
to=<postmaster at safe.ca>, relay=safemail.safe.ca[192.219.254.77]:25,
delay=335, delays=332/0.03/1.3/1.3, dsn=4.0.0, status=deferred (host
safemail.safe.ca[192.219.254.77] said: 462 ATTENTION!!!
<http://mentor2.safe.ca/validation?id=0000-20090222-96835829-586>,
PLEASE CLICK ON THIS LINK TO BE VALIDATED. (Your E-mail has been
detected as coming from a Spamming server. In order to accept your first
emails we need a validation) (in reply to RCPT TO command))

for me, your server should be listed for eternity ;-p