[RFCI-Discuss] is a reversename a must ?

[Jeff Pang]

-----Original Message-----
>From: csmailreport <csmailreport at googlemail.com>
>Sent: Jan 24, 2008 3:57 AM
>To: Jeff Pang <pangj at earthlink.net>, Discussion about the RFC-Ignorant Project <rfci-discuss at lists.megacity.org>
>Subject: Re: [RFCI-Discuss] is a reversename a must ?
>
>On Jan 23, 2008 3:11 PM, Jeff Pang <pangj at earthlink.net> wrote:
>> So many email servers have no rDNS.So we now don't and won't in future reject those messages who are coming from the servers without rDNS names.
>
>
>Well, given than in my experience, a lot of the badly configured mail servers
>(= lacking a PTR record, in violation of RFC 1033)
>are located in China (maybe Korea/Taiwan too...) or Russia / former
>USSR countries,
>I can certainly understand why you'd rather not refuse email from such hosts.
>

Yes I have replied to this question on my last message.

Regards,
Jeff Pang