[RFCI-Discuss] selective dsn rejection

[mouss]

csmailreport wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 10:44 PM, mouss <mouss at netoyen.net> wrote:
>>
>>  That's what I hope. if so this should be made clear on the policy page
>>  to avoid "long debates"...
>>     
>
> Actually... shouldn't we both have checked the DSN policy page itself before
> wasting other people's valuable time here ? :-)
>   

I did check it before posting (actually, I was certain that such 
selective rejects would be ok, but before replying on the SA list, I 
wanted to make sure, so I went to the page and found myself "less 
certain" :)
> http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-dsn.php
>
> If the rejection message clearly indicates the reason for denial as not
>   
>> being something related to the null-envelope (or above-mentioned timeout)
>> ("{ip} rejected as listed on the MAPS RBL", etc.), then that spam-blocking
>> shall not be considered grounds to list a domain.
>>     

This says if the rejection is not "related to the null-envelope". In the 
case I am about, it is "related" as the dsn is used in the criteria (and 
this would be easy to test, since the same client would be allowed if 
another sender address is used).

I now realize I had a typo in my original post where I said "related to 
dns". I of course meant "related to dsn".