[RFCI-Discuss] Yahoo break RFC

[Derek J. Balling]

On Oct 30, 2007, at 9:37 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> Then we have to adjust our SPF antipsam policy, if we follow Yahoo,  
>> we
>> must give up all SPF checking. This is what we don't like to see.
>
> what do you mean? Just do SPF checking and reject all mail that  
> doesn't pass
> through SPF check. It's yahoo who will have to take care of forged and
> rejected e-mail.

Exactly. Let Yahoo deal with that problem.   Yahoo doesn't care about  
SPF, because it's not their internally developed DomainKeys solution  
(although, to be fair, I have no idea how their method works with DK  
either, since I could set the from address to my own domain, and they  
don't have the private-key goodness to sign it appropriately)....

Cheers,
D

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2419 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.megacity.org/pipermail/rfci-discuss/attachments/20071030/81803ab7/attachment-0001.bin