[RFCI-Discuss] Re: RFC4408 aka SPF

[Frank Ellermann]

Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:

> Whatever they are, they are not RFC ignorant.

> All examples you gave are equivalent to "v=spf1 all".

> At best you could argue that "+a +mx +all" is unnecessary
> use of resources, and thus should be banned.

Maybe that happens already somewhere, a recent thread on
SPF HELP sounded like it.  In that case the "+all" effect
was an error, the publisher didn't get the idea:

<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spf.help/5241>

No job for RFCI, and "bogusns" or "badnews" zones would
be more interesting than "bogusspf", SPF has a built-in
error correction with its PermError MUSTard.

Frank