[RFCI-Discuss] listing of upc.cz and bigpond.com

[Derek J. Balling]

Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
>   Your message
>    [...]
>   did not reach the following recipient(s):
> 
> This has been accepted before as sufficient evidence.
> 
> If not:  make "abuse" an entry address to a forwarder, forward to
> non-existing addresses, and claim to have received a message to abuse.

I think the issue was that the *original* message had multiple 
recipients, e.g., abuse at DOMAIN_ONE, abuse at DOMAIN_TWO, and that a failure 
for a 'non-abuse' address would be unclear which of the multiple 
recipients caused the failure.

As I pointed out, it's fairly easy -- with a little sleuthing -- to 
figure it out in the case-in-point, but certainly the principle is 
valid, that if it was sent to multiple people, you need to show WHICH of 
the original recipients generated the bounce.

That said, while I was defending the fact that it "could be listed" for 
such criteria, another person marked it for removal. It probably could 
be re-submitted with someone only sending to ONE recipient as opposed to 
many.

Cheers,
D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3241 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.megacity.org/pipermail/rfci-discuss/attachments/20070219/4fa6c39c/smime.bin