[RFCI-Discuss] abuse@ blackholes and autoreplies.

[Alan Brown]

As a heads-up.

ntlworld.com has just been added to RFC-i, despite having an abuse
autoreply.

That autoreply states that complainants should use a webform and implies
that abuse@ mail will eventually be read, however the help page also
linked in the reply makes it clear that abuse complaints are not
accepted via email.

I put in the submission, considering it a test case. I'm pleased with
the decision. Are there any simlar instances?