[RFCI-Discuss] Re: abuse@qwest.net removing attachments
mouss
mouss at netoyen.net
Mon May 1 21:32:27 EDT 2006
Alan Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2006, Jeff Makey wrote:
>
>
>>> How can you demonstrate it is spam if you insist on getting the original
>>> email but without its embedded MIME elements ?
>>>
>> Send the LART without using MIME, and include the full original e-mail
>> message as part of your plain text message. There is rarely a need
>> for an ISP to examine message content to identify spam, anyway.
>>
>
> There is if they're hosting it.
>
>
>
No. There is no need to "examine message content". headers are needed to
make sure the guy understands what he is talking about (to avoid people
trusting "From" headers and the like), but past this, the complaint is
enough to raise flags. The complaint purpose isn't to drive a spammer to
court. The purpose is to make the sp/relay/.... aware of that. He can
then do whatever to stop/trap/.... the miscreant. In no case is the
attachment needed (because the miscreant will certainly send other ones,
when he is being watched. and if this is a virus, then they will tell
you it's life).
More information about the RFCI-Discuss
mailing list