[RFCI-Discuss] many domains reject dsn/pm/abuse per local policy

[Matus UHLAR - fantomas]

On 30.01 20:27, mouss wrote:
> While we are after maximizing the database size (-;), shouldn't domains
> that reject mail with
>     sender=<>
> and
>     rcpt=<postmaster>

"and"? Don't you mean "or"? mails from <> to <postmaster> were allowed to be
rejected, if the postmaster does not send mail.

> based on an RBL (including DUL lists and rfci) be listed in dsn and
> postmaster sections? (similar thing for abuse).
> After all, anybody can reject dsn/pm/abuse and claim "you are listed on
> our private BL".

I think that  http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-postmaster.php explains it
all

> In short, I see no fundamental difference between:
> 
> MAIL FROM:<>
> 5xx rejected because of dul.example.org
> 
> and
> 
> MAIL FROM:<>
> 5xx rejected because your are listed in bl.local.example

if your mail is refused by anyone, you can post it here or submit it for
listing - someone will (hopefully) check the same - if they are blocking
all who check for it with comment telling that only they are listed, people
here will probably find it and the domain will be listed.


-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Save the whales. Collect the whole set.