[RFCI-Discuss] Rejected <> evidence

[John A. Martin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>>>>> "Winston" == Winston L Sorfleet
>>>>> "Re: [RFCI-Discuss] Rejected <> evidence"
>>>>>  Mon, 21 Oct 2002 08:37:41 -0400

    Winston> Looks like it's just you.  But even my
    Winston> romanus.ocunix.on.ca ehlo works, so at least it's not
    Winston> because they're using the rfci list.

Yes.  Is that reason to reject the nomination?

    >> The result of all three of these nominations is, as seen by one
    >> site, to make psychoanalysis.net inexplicably and totally
    >> unreachable through the mail system without recourse to other
    >> services.

Where do the rfc's or the rfc-ignorant policies state that a site must
act ignorantly to more than one site to be nominated?

Any site has the full right to refuse any mail for any reason or for
no reason, but IMHO a site is contributing brokenness to the Internet
when thy fail to give a meaningful reason why when they exercise that
right.

	jam

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEARECAAYFAj2z+OoACgkQUEvv1b/iXy/vmgCgjDrHiT5VOOhEsaZQlVwwiGZ1
pG4AoIF89JuV4uBONba0iD47P3U3pgG3
=C2v0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----